In every company Iβve worked for, the “build, buy, or partner” dilemma is a recurring theme. Hereβs the typical breakdown:
π§ Build: “Weβre the experts, so letβs develop this ourselves and keep all the revenue.”
π° Buy: “We can acquire a company with the needed capabilities and speed up market entry.”
π€ Partner: “We could collaborate with an expert, though weβd need to share the revenue and wonβt own the IP.”
Hereβs what often happens:
π§ Build: Takes twice as long, costs double, and generates half the expected revenue.
π° Buy: Overpay for new capabilities and still end up with only half of the projected revenue due to over-aggressive estimates.
π€ Partner: Frequently overlooked because “we know more than they do.”
Why should you consider partnering?
- Focus on Strengths: Excel in what you do best and partner for the rest. Repeat that 3 times! π‘
- Efficient Investment: Building in-house depletes resources and diverts focus from core activities.
- Expertise with Lower Risk: Partnerships offer minimal cost and leverage external expertise.
- Future Acquisition Insight: Partnering lets you “test drive” a potential acquisition, reducing risk and providing clarity on what you’re buying.
Remember this piece of wisdom: Every company has a fixed budget (peanut butter) and endless opportunities (bread).
You can:
- Spread that peanut butter thinly over the entire loaf, ending up with mediocre sandwiches.
- Apply it strategically to a few select pieces of bread, resulting in fewer but amazing sandwiches.
Choose great sandwiches! π₯ͺβ¨
Whatβs your take on the build, buy, or partner strategy? Share your experiences and thoughts below!